Disconnection and Ignorance in a Dominance Hierarchy

“It may be no exaggeration to say that stupidity has killed more people than all the diseases known to medicine and psychiatry.

“Intelligence is the capacity to receive, decode and transmit information efficiently. Stupidity is blockage of this process at any point. Bigotry, ideologies etc. block the ability to receive; robotic reality-tunnels block the ability to decode or integrate new signals; censorship blocks transmission.”

~Robert Anton Wilson, Prometheus Rising

“There’s probably a lot of rich people who are pretty dumb and then get really lucky and do really well in business. And there might be some rich people who are pretty smart but I wonder now if being this level of rich and having all these influential people if it makes you dumber.

“The reason why I think it makes makes you dumber is for exactly the effect that I mentioned before, that you’re always talking to people who are like ChatGPT, who are sycophantic. And I feel like that makes you stupider because you’re not getting any hardcore resistance. You’re not getting any friction.

“More and more your ideas are getting taken up as having insights, which reinforces the idea that you’re really smart, which removes the filter on your thoughts. You just say any old stupid thing and people are just like, “Yeah, that’s really interesting. There’s an interesting insight there.”

“So, you just become dumber and dumber and dumber because nothing you say is getting any friction or resistance to the point where all of the sudden you just become basically an idiot with money.”

~The Philosophy of Jeffrey Epstein, 55 minute mark,
Pill Pod Philosophy & Critical Theory Podcast

The highest echelons of the upper class are the most disconnected and isolated. Their entire social reality is siloed and forms an echo chamber that repeats back to them their own biases and prejudices. They are told what they want to hear by yes men, flatterers, fluffers, subordinates, employees, servants, and beneficiaries. And they hear their views repeated by pundits, public intellectuals, talking heads, lobbyists, politicians, etc. So, they fall into confirmation bias and smart idiot effect. All they really know is how to maintain plutocracy and manipulate the system. Think of Jeffrey Epstein having stated that real work is only for the ‘goyim’ (i.e., the inferior).*

The economic, cultural, and ruling elite are alienated and estranged from the lived experience of most of humanity, from reality and basic knowledge on the ground. Robert Anton Wilson argued this is why the people controlling society and creating the rules are so dumb and incompetent, leading to failure and decline.** In a dominance hierarchy, each person avoids telling any inconvenient and uncomfortable truth to superiors and authority figures, so as to keep their job and keep out of trouble. Level after level, after the message finally gets to the top, it’s been filtered and shaped to fit the social norms, cultural expectations, conventional ideology, dominant paradigm, master narrative, and ruling system.

This is why the emperor can be made to walk around naked believing he is clothed in the finest garment. In the story, the child points out the truth and makes it public knowledge. But in our society of near total information control, that rarely happens. The child would never be heard, would never be platformed, would never make it into the MSM or national politics. This is why Epstein, like Donald Trump and Elon Musk, falsely believe they’re genius-level masters of the universe. The whole system serves them. They’ve come to believe their own lies. The best con succeeds by the con man first conning himself.

Alienation works differently for the permanent underclass. They are propagandized and indoctrinated, disinformed and made ignorant. But what the dirty masses aren’t is disconnected from the real world problems and consequences. And neither are they as stunted in terms of cognitive empathy, as research shows that the poor have the greatest ability to accurately read the minds and predict the behavior of others. The awareness of the subjugated, though, is distorted by the system of social control they’re trapped in. For most of them, they only know what the elite allow them to know.

The middle class, however, might have the most interesting position. In being better educated and more well read, they’re not as ignorant and disinformed as those below them but more so than those above. Simultaneously, they’re not as clueless and obtuse as the elite, if to a far greater extent than the masses. So, though in one sense they’re less worse off than both the dominators and the dominated, their middling position means they neither have the advantages found at the polar ends of the socioeconomic spectrum. The middle is a muddle. They lack the perspective from the top and the bottom. This is why it’s most dangerous when the middle class allies with the ruling class.

* * * *

Notes:

*In a 2009 email to Roger Schank, Jeffrey Epstein explained that, “This is the way the jew make money… and made a fortune in the past ten years, selling short the shipping futures, let the goyim deal in the real world.” As a Zionist and Jewish supremacist, he really did want a Jewish cabal that conspires to control the world. But his attitude is identical to the non-Jewish oligarchs and plutocrats who have seized the US government. Consider Elon Musk and Peter Thiel with their grandiose vision of a Butterfly Revolution that will lead to techno-feudalism. They fantasy about balkanizing civilization into big tech fiefdoms that are ruled separately by each of them as lords and masters over their respective serfdoms.

**In an essay published elsewhere, I discuss empathy in terms of sociopolitical conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO) (Liberal Empathy, the Weapon of Satan). I argue that it’s because of a lack of cognitive empathy, including of their own mind, that they lack self-awareness and hence self-control. [Self-awareness is a subset of social awareness, as the child must first learn to model the minds of others before they can do the same for themselves.] Then they project their inner sense of chaos and disorder outward onto the world. So, in feeling out of control, they seek to control others and all of society. But as they’re unconscious chaos agents, they wreck everything they touch with problems, failures, and crises proliferating.

* * * *

File:Great Seal of the United States (reverse).svg

Wilson uses the eye in the pyramid as a symbol of the dysfunction of hierarchies. Every level except the top is blind, but the eye can see only one way. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Celine’s Second Law
from Wikipedia

“Accurate communication is possible only in a non-punishing situation.”[2]

Wilson rephrases this himself many times as “communication occurs only between equals”. Celine calls this law “a simple statement of the obvious” and refers to the fact that everyone who labors under an authority figure tends to lie to and flatter that authority figure in order to protect themselves either from violence or from deprivation of security (such as losing one’s job). In essence, it is usually more in the interests of any worker to tell his boss what he wants to hear, not what is true.[3]

In any hierarchy, every level below the highest carries a subtle burden to see the world in the way their superiors expect it to be seen and to provide feedback to their superiors that their superiors want to hear. In the end, any hierarchical organization supports what its leaders already think is true more than it challenges them to think differently. The levels below the leaders are more interested in keeping their jobs than telling the truth.

Wilson, in Prometheus Rising, uses the example of J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI. Hoover saw communist infiltrators and spies everywhere, and he told his agents to hunt them down. Therefore, FBI agents began seeing and interpreting everything they could as parts of the communist conspiracy. Some even went as far as framing people as communists, making largely baseless arrests and doing everything they could to satisfy Hoover’s need to find and drive out the communist conspiracy. The problem is, such a conspiracy was greatly exaggerated. Hoover thought it was monolithic and pervasive, and any agent who dared point out the lack of evidence to Hoover would be at best denied promotions, and at worst labeled a communist himself and lose his job. Any agent who knew the truth would be very careful to hide the fact.

Meanwhile, the FBI was largely ignoring the problem of organized crime (the Mafia), because Hoover insisted that organized crime did not exist on the national scale. Not only does the leader of the hierarchy see what he wants to see, but he also does not see what he does not want to see. Agents who pursued the issue of organized crime were sometimes marginalized within the organization or hounded into retirement.

In the end, Celine states, any hierarchy acts more to conceal the truth from its leaders than it serves to find the truth.

The People Making “The Rules” are Dumber Than You
by Kevin Carson

The people who regulate what you do, in most cases, know less about what you’re doing than you do. It doesn’t matter whether it’s nominally a “public” or “private” organization, or how smart the people running it are as individuals. No matter how smart the people in charge are, they are systematically stupid in their organizational roles, because of the dynamics of information flow in hierarchies (as described by Robert Anton Wilson, for example).

Organizations are pyramids, and the people at the tops of the pyramids tend to communicate much more effectively with each other than they do with those at the bottoms of their own respective pyramids. That means that most organizations are riddled with “best practices” based almost entirely on feedback about how well they worked from people at the tops of the other pyramids. And those latter people have almost no valid knowledge of how the policies actually worked in their own organizations.

Remember the story of the Emperor’s new clothes? Large organizations are designed to insulate naked emperors from unpleasant feedback. That set of clothes must look good, because the emperors at the other organizations all have a set just like it, and they can’t stop talking about how great they look!

The state, by promoting centralization and hierarchy and insulating bureaucratic organizations from the competitive consequences of their inefficiency, causes such irrationality to predominate in our society. We’re living in the world of Terry Gilliam’s “Brazil.”

The Illuminatus Trilogy
by Robert Anton Wilson & Robert Shea

It is now theoretically possible to link the human nervous system into a radio network so that, micro-miniaturized receivers being implanted in people’s brains, the messages coming out of these radios would be indistinguishable to the subjects from the voice of their own thoughts. One central transmitter, located in the nation’s capital, could broadcast all day long what the authorities wanted the people to believe. The average man on the receiving end of these broadcasts would not even know he was a robot; he would think it was his own voice he was listening to. The average woman could be treated similarly.

It is ironic that people will find such a concept both shocking and frightening. Like Orwell’s 1984, this is not a fantasy of the future but a parable of the present. Every citizen in every authoritarian society already has such a “radio” built into his or her brain. This radio is the little voice that asks, each time a desire is formed, “Is it safe? Will my wife (my husband/my boss/my church/my community) approve? Will people ridicule and mock me? Will the police come and arrest me?” This little voice the Freudians call “the superego,” which Freud himself vividly characterized as “the ego’s harsh master.” With a more functional approach, Peris, Hefferline and Goodman, in Gestalt Therapy, describe this process as “a set of conditioned verbal habits.” This set, which is fairly uniform throughout any authoritarian society, determines the actions which will, and will not, occur there. Let us consider humanity a biogram (the basic DNA blueprint of the human organism and its potentials) united with a logogram (this set of “conditioned verbal habits”). The biogram has not changed in several hundred thousand years; the logogram is different in each society. When the logogram reinforces the biogram, we have a libertarian society, such as still can be found among some American Indian tribes. Like Confucianism before it became authoritarian and rigidified, American Indian ethics is based on speaking from the heart and acting from the heart—that is, from the biogram.

No authoritarian society can tolerate this. All authority is based on conditioning men and women to act from the logogram, since the logogram is a set created by those in authority.

Every authoritarian logogram divides society, as it divides the individual, into alienated halves. Those at the bottom suffer what I shall call the burden of nescience. The natural sensory activity of the biogram— what the person sees, hears, smells, tastes, feels, and, above all, what the organism as a whole, or as a potential whole, wants —is always irrelevant and immaterial. The authoritarian logogram, not the field of sensed experience, determines what is relevant and material. This is as true of a highly paid advertising copywriter as it is of an engine lathe operator. The person acts, not on personal experience and the evaluations of the nervous system, but on the orders from above. Thus, personal experience and personal judgment being nonoperational, these functions become also less “real.” They exist, if at all, only in that fantasy land which Freud called the Unconscious. Since nobody has found a way to prove that the Freudian Unconscious really exists, it can be doubted that personal experience and personal judgment exist; it is an act of faith to assume they do. The organism has become, as Marx said, “a tool, a machine, a robot.”

Those at the top of the authoritarian pyramid, however, suffer an equal and opposite burden of omniscience. All that is forbidden to the servile class— the web of perception, evaluation and participation in the sensed universe— is demanded of the members of the master class. They must attempt to do the seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, feeling and decision-making for the whole society.

But a man with a gun is told only that which people assume will not provoke him to pull the trigger. Since all authority and government are based on force, the master class, with its burden of omniscience, faces the servile class, with its burden of nescience, precisely as a highwayman faces his victim. Communication is possible only between equals. The master class never abstracts enough information from the servile class to know what is actually going on in the world where the actual productivity of society occurs. Furthermore, the logogram of any authoritarian society remains fairly inflexible as time passes, but everything else in the universe constantly changes. The result can only be progressive disorientation among the rulers. The end is debacle.

The schizophrenia of authoritarianism exists both in the individual and in the whole society.

I call this the Snafu Principle.

Everything is Under Control
by Robert Anton Wilson w/ Miram Joan Hill

Another factor tending to multiply conspiracy theories beyond necessity lies in the fact that all intelligence agencies have two functions, viz.:

  1. Collection of accurate information.
  2. Planting and encouraging inaccurate information.

An intelligence agency, in other words, needs to know “what the hell is really going on” for the same reason a bank or a grocer or you and I need that kind of factual input. Hence, the huge budgets for item 1 above.

Intelligence agencies, however, also need to keep ahead of their competitors, the rival intelligence agencies of other and, hence, perfidious governments. They therefore engage in frenetic efforts of spreading misinformation, “disinformation” (a euphemism for the former), “cover stories,” “cover-ups,” etc. In order to deceive whoever currently functions as “the enemy,” these fantasies must have enough facts mixed into them, and enough general plausibility, that they will deceive many others not yet defined as “enemy.” Always, they must deceive persons of average intelligence and average education or they just don’t work. The best disinformation should also deceive persons of more-than-average wit and know-how, for a while at least.

In brief, modern secret-police work functions much like poker. All players try to send false signals at least part of the time, and ll players try to detect “the real truth” behind the false signals sent by the others.In a world where nations relate to each other in this manner, conspiracy models flourish like bacteria in a sewage system. As Henry Kissinger allegedly said, “Anybody in Washington who isn’t paranoid must be crazy.” Indeed, any citizen in a world run like that who doesn’t have some “paranoid” suspicions must have suffered brain damage in childhood.

When the government engages in extensive (well-publicized) snooping and spying on the public, this paranoia escalates rapidly. Where there exists a secret police agency of any sort, in any nation, the people soon learn to suspect those who suspect them. Concretely, many Americans fear that any part of government, or even any organization not admittedly part of the government, may function as a front for the CIA, the FBI, the BATF, the National Security Agency, or groups even more esoteric and manipulative.

Thus, the more omnipresent the government’s “control,” the more suspicious and uneasy the people become. And the more people indicate a lack of faith of such government, the more such government will need to spy on them, to feel absolutely sure they have not become alienated enough to hatch rebellion or set off more homemade bombs of the Oklahoma City variety. The government will therefore increase its spying and snooping, and the people will become more “careful.” As a crude kind of survey, I have asked audiences in hundreds of lectures and seminars if any of them ever willingly tell the whole truth about anything to a government official. Nobody has ever held up their hand and claimed that degree of faith and tractability.

No man or woman in the United States today wants the Feds to know too much about what he or she is really doing. Since the government long ago passed the point of “anything not forbidden is compulsory” and now also wishes to enforce “anything not compulsory is forbidden,” we all suspect that we are technical criminals at least, although like Kafka’s hero we are never quite sure which statute or statutes we may have violated.

We thus arrive at a situation that in the Army is called Optimum Snafu. Those at the top are never told what might cause them to punish the informant, and those at the bottom keep their mouths shut about more and more of what they actually see, hear, smell, taste, or otherwise sense of the environment. In the long run, the top people in the pyramid are attempting to regulate things they know nothing about, based on reports that have been invented by liars and flatterers to prevent them from using their awful powers too destructively.

But if most people always lie a little in dealing with the State, the State must have a very weird and inaccurate picture of who the people are and what they really think and want. Laws will therefore direct themselves to a fictitious citizenry, not to the people we really are. Thus, the laws increasingly make no sense to the folk who have to endure them, and more hostility to government appears.

All these cycles make up a set of Strange Loops and Vicious Circles from which there presently appears no exit. Unless, as suggested before, the funding runs out or Divine Intervention occurs, conspiracy theories will flourish, both among the increasingly anxiety-ridden citizenry and among the politicos and bureaucrats who try to command them. And every voice that tries, or pretends, to tell the truth in this schizoid situation immediately comes under suspicion as another possible Deceiver and Manipulator whose yarn has to be looked at as critically as any PostModernist would look at the Declaration of Independence or the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

We are all Deconstructionists now, whether we ever heard the word before or not.

Saying the Right Thing, Doing the Right Thing

“I’ve met all sorts of people, including major war criminals. I don’t regret having met any of them.”
~Noam Chomsky

“Chomsky played a part in cultivating the Michael Tracey, Matt Taibbi wing with alt media that defends [Jeffrey] Epstein, & by extension the other forces of ruling-class pedophilia. Remember that all of this comes from the campaign to promote a non-communist left, which Chomsky embodies.”
~Rainer Shea, Substack

That view of Noam Chomsky is something I’ve been chewing on for a long time. While often impressed by his intellectual scholarship and leftist critique, as early as 2010, I noticed something that bothered me.

When asked by a young man about what to do, all he gave was a quippy response that amounted to nothing Ye slaves, find yer own ways.”

He offered no genuine alternative, solution, or pathway forward. Without articulating a collective project, his ideology has left the individual stranded against forces far beyond us all. He didn’t propose any hope of solidarity, of class or group consciousness.

Though I had a hard time putting my finger on it at the time, I now look back at it with greater knowledge and perspective.

It reminds me of how, during the Cold War, the CIA funded and promoted postmodernists so as to suck out the oxygen from the room of leftist spaces (literary magazines, writer workshops, etc). It was intended to drown out and silence Marxists. It was successful in that postmodernism became so prominent that right-wingers came to complain about it.

Maybe Chomsky’s anarchism has served a similar role for the powers that be. He offers a critique that, if not empty, is impotent. It leads nowhere and so fuels demoralization and helplessness.

“Reading Chomsky’s emails and advice to Epstein, who by then was already known for pleading guilty to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution, is enough. It actually lends more credence to the idea that Chomsky was controlled opposition and a government asset, a herder of leftism to pacify revolutionary tactics and discourage its practice.”
~Rex Eloquens, An Epitaph for Noam Chomsky

Why would he willingly serve this role in crippling the left? And now in his ties to Epstein being proven, why would he destroy his entire reputation and legacy?

“There’s nothing that makes me crazier than when a guy who I know is ten times smarter than me acts like he is dumber than me.”
~Jimmy Dore

“While attaining credibility for doing the most basic, human thing for Palestine, he ran in the same circles of Zionists like Epstein who wanted to overthrow Syria, Iran and Russia among others. The same people who wanted to destroy Gaza and have done so. He knew who Epstein was and his affiliations with Zionism; how he wouldn’t have known about his Mossad ties? Was he an idiot? No. More likely an opportunist.”
~Fiorella Isabel, from X

Though presenting himself as an outsider, he has been an insider for his entire career.

And so he wasn’t offering a genuinely outside perspective. But until recently, it wasn’t clear what kind of insider he was or rather exactly what he was inside of. This is the problem with any public figures aligned with the Democratic Party, as was Chomsky.

It’s not to suggest he was consciously part of a conspiracy. It’s simply that, in being drawn into the system of power, he took on the biases of it. One doesn’t have to be among the ruling elite to have one’s imagination and identity constrained by the ideological realism that maintains elite rule.

Chomsky almost certainly began with good intentions, as most people do. And he came to believe in the bullshit of lesser evilism, if we are to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He is a lesson to us all.

The moral decadence inherent to that worldview slowly led him into the gravity of a blackmail pedophilia ring, what seems to have been part of a vast transnational intelligence operation. Likely, all along the way, he stated persuasive reasons for why he did this or that. The transition over time was probably so subtle that he never, at any given point, realized how far he had gone into a world he once would’ve hated.

That is how he ended up as a partisan stooge, in maintaining the bipartisan control of the American Empire.

Democrats aren’t an opposition party but controlled opposition. They operate as part of the gatekeepers. They are the managers of the Overton window who, in consistently attacking the broad left (and silencing the left-liberal supermajority), declare what’s allowable or not: This far left and no further!

Related to this, it’s how we the American public have allowed ourselves to be controlled and manipulated. The following are my thoughts during the presidential campaign season before the 2016 election:

“I’ve always had an oddly optimistic side of my personality. Despite my depression and skepticism, I’m a possibility thinker and I try to gain a larger perspective to see beyond whatever shittiness is going on in any given moment. It’s easy to be cynical, but that seems like a boring way to live if that is a knee-jerk reaction and thoughtless attitude.

“Yet the political left supporting someone so horrific as Clinton is snuffing out what hope I’ve held onto all these years. I’m shocked by how few people comprehend how far gone is our society. It’s long past the time of playing these kinds of games. I don’t want to give up on this country, but so many Americans have already given up by default of the choices they’re making. Fighting the good fight is seemingly ever more pointless as time goes on.

“I’m starting to think we’re just going to have to let the situation go beyond redemption and then rebuild out of the rubble. We will collectively take our problems seriously when there is no other choice left, after we’ve wasted all other opportunities and have backed ourselves into a corner. That is a sad conclusion to come to.”

It reminds one of the old quote, often attributed to Winston Churchill: “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing – after they’ve tried everything else.” If we haven’t yet quite tried everything else, one suspects we’re getting close to that point. It would be nice for the American people to finally move onto the final stage of doing the right thing.

My above words were from the comments section at one of my earlier writings, The Chomsky Problem (2016).

“Noam Chomsky’s life and work cannot be understood without taking into account his militarily-funded linguistics research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). There were, I believe, always two ‘Noam Chomskys’ – one working for the US military and the other working tirelessly against that same military. This contradiction cannot explain every aspect of Chomsky’s puzzling friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. But it is the underlying contradiction that helps us understand why someone as radical as Chomsky ended up being involved with someone as reactionary as Epstein.”
~Chris Knight, The Chomsky/Epstein Puzzle

I’ve long complained about Chomsky, such as his repeatedly acting as a sheepdog for the corporate Democrats.

But in my linked piece, I clarified that it’s a deeper problem, as he long ago was mired in Pentagon money and hence a part of the military-industrial complex, something he rationalized away as he did with Epstein’s crimes (Chomsky subreddit, Noam & Valeria Chomsky’s reactions to Epstein’s sex trafficking charges). Working at MIT, it was simply the water he swam in.

For all his outward opposition to capitalism, in the end, Chomsky was part of the capitalist system. And he protected it, if he may not have realized how he was being duped and used.

But it’s also telling how, strangely as it seemed in the past, he was always ready to dismiss ‘conspiracy theories’. What made this strange was precisely that his political scholarship described conspiracies in great detail. He provided the undeniable and irrefutable proof that so-called  conspiracy theories were conspiracy facts. He couldn’t recognize it, though; or he couldn’t allow it into his awareness.

Maybe his reluctance to openly speak of conspiracies was because, in a sense, he realized he was part of one.

“There is no ethical way to be a billionaire. Literally, having that much money and power destroys your brain, destroys your morality to the point where it’s clear from these files that Epstein and others considered themselves completely above the law and held any sort of value for human life. And that’s what really comes out of these things, that the billionaire class that rules us has to be destroyed and overthrown.”
~Alan MacLeod

One might add that neither is there an ethical way to be associated with the billionaire class.

Many of Chomsky’s fans and supporters are now shocked to find him in the Epstein files. It turns out he was a close friend and adviser of Jeffrey Epstein.

“One email from Chomsky and his second wife Valeria describes the couple’s friendship with Epstein as ‘deep and sincere and everlasting’. Another from Valeria describes Epstein as: ‘our best friend. I mean “the” one.’ Meanwhile other messages – signed only by Chomsky himself – are equally generous to the convicted sex offender, saying, for example, ‘we’re with you all the way’ and ‘you’re constantly with us in spirit and in our thoughts.’”
~Chris Knight, The Chomsky/Epstein Puzzle

He helped Epstein to launder his reputation after his horrendous crimes were revealed. That is to say Chomsky gave advice on how to manufacture consent, by managing his public image. In return, Epstein gave Chomsky financial advice, along with paying for his flights and hotel rooms, and basically funding a life of luxury. Chomsky even flew on the infamous Lolita Express.

To the very end of Epstein’s life, Chomsky continued to defend him in the press. But he forgot to mention his financial ties to Epstein.

Sadly, cynical as I’ve become, I was unsurprised. I knew there was something off about Chomsky long ago, if it required more careful analysis to figure it out back then. But now it’s become obvious how corrupted and complicit he has been. This is why we should avoid hero worship.

“He gave a confirmed rapist advice on how to dodge the latest allegations against him.”
~Anna Kasparian

More importantly, this demonstrates how bad things have gotten when even many of the leading critics of the system of power are themselves implicated in what they criticized. It’s a broader problem. There is a reason to speak of it being systemic, as it’s not only about individual bad actors.

But we also must come to more than a mere intellectual understanding.

Chomsky is one of the greatest living leftist intellectuals. Yet his keen mind and vast knowledge didn’t protect him. That’s likely because he lacked social science understanding, in spite of being an expert in linguistics. Though talking about systems, and though somewhat understanding how the system invades the mind through media rhetoric, apparently he didn’t fully grasp how this operated psychologically, couldn’t see it happening to himself.

Self-awareness is often a weak point in human nature. That is all the more reason to carefully study the so-called soft sciences.

There are some leftist critics, though, who have maintained their moral commitment and principles. Another Jewish public intellectual, Norman Finkelstein, was also personally invited into Epstein’s social circle. But he refused and basically told them to fuck off. He is one of the harshest voices against Zionist Apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide.

Maybe that is what allowed Finkelstein to see the Epstein group for what it was. Then again, he didn’t have any knowledge that wasn’t also possessed by Chomsky, as the latter was likewise anti-Zionist. But in the end, one has to want to see.

[As a side note, there is another earlier piece (Anarchists Not In Universities) where I wrote about Chomsky and academia, specifically in terms of power and compromise. I used the anarchist David Graeber as a contrast.

That analysis was from 8 years ago. My other writings on the topic mentioned above were even earlier from 2010 and 2016. So, off and on, this has been on my mind long before any known connections to Epstein. Just some things kept bothering me about Chomsky.]

“My guess is, if Epstein put your daughter at age 15 in such a position, you wouldn’t publicly describe him as a ‘friend’ and person of ‘integrity’. In fact, I would hope that you’d promptly throttle both Epstein and Dershowitz.”
~Norman Finkelstein

As a citizenry, we need to learn to discern between the likes of Chomsky and the likes of Finkelstein. Outwardly, they may appear to be similar as public intellectuals. But we should always be wary when someone like Chomsky, though a boring intellectual as a supposed anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist, was a guest on corporate MSM more often than one would expect.

There probably is good reason Finkelstein, on the other hand, has remained largely unseen in the legacy media and been kept unknown to most Americans. He has refused to play nicely with the powerful, has refused to tone down his harsh message of righteous denunciation.

We need to recognize such people as Chomsky for who they are without requiring a massive conspiracy reveal like the Epstein files. All the evidence was available long ago to mistrust Chomsky for those who wanted to understand. We must develop the moral courage to look at what’s uncomfortable, including and especially about those we perceive as being on our side.

This requires, though, to have that aforementioned self-awareness. It’s not only Chomsky who can fool himself. We all have that capacity.

With all the craziness going on right now, it’s hard to feel excited that so much is being forced to the surface. It shouldn’t ever have been allowed to go so far, to get this bad.

Democrats could’ve stopped it. Any number of political leaders, government figures, bureaucratic officials, and influential elites could’ve stopped it. But they all knew what was happening, knew where it was going, and complicitly did nothing (A Deep Dive Into the Deep State; & Who Are the Distractors and Who Is the Distraction?); or sometimes actively did the worst, such as Democrats always willing to vote in support of the next GOP bill to fund ICE, Israel, etc.

It’s tiresome to be one of the individuals to see it all coming and yet unable to stop it or even get many others to pay attention.

“But the Epstein files reveal more than personal loyalty between him and Noam Chomsky. They expose political coordination.

“In emails with Epstein, Chomsky discussed the war in Syria, specifically the use of armed Salafi and Wahhabi groups to overthrow the Syrian government. Chomsky acknowledged that US and allied efforts against President Bashar al-Assad relied heavily on extremist factions including al-Muser front and ISIS.

“Rather than rejecting the strategy outright, Chomsky framed the rise of these groups as an unfortunate but tolerable consequence of a broader campaign for regime change. Privately expressing views that sharply contrasted with his public opposition to US interventionism.”
~Mnar Adley

If I made complaints of Chomsky even a month ago, many (most?) leftists would’ve ignored it or defended him. Why did it take the partial release — maybe 1% —  of the Epstein files for more people to be capable of demanding and hard-hitting critical thought? Why do we have to let things turn so dark and destructive before we no longer can ignore them?

If democracy is ever to be possible, we’re going to have to become better as a people. Sadly, in many ways, we do get the leaders we deserve in that we get what we accept and allow. Too many Americans want to be lied to, want to be told a nice story.

As such, it was easier to listen to Chomsky’s words than to look at his history of actions, to research and study his background. What is not spoken may say more.

“If Chomsky’s defining intellectual contribution was the naming of structural violence — the unseen forms of harm produced by political and economic systems — then what we see here is its fraternal twin: structural silence.”
~Richard S. Pinner, Structural Silence: Chomsky, Epstein, and the Architecture of Elite Immunity

It’s a welcome change that this situation is forcing awake more Americans, left and right. But it doesn’t change the basic problem. The moment it slips out of public awareness again, as new scandals and catastrophes replace it, what will stop Americans from forgetting about it and falling back to sleep?

That has been my worry.

Trump will eventually be forced out of office. He’ll be voted out, he’ll get impeached, he’ll die, or dementia will finally catch up with him. Then what? Will we go back to the lesser evil voting that constantly brought us to greater evil? As a cartoonish supervillain for the public to organize against, Trump may represent our last opportunity to finally and fully destroy the corrupt system.

We can’t let big money Democrats step in to normalize it again, as they’ve done in the past. That is what happened with Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Democrats helped to establish George W. Bush’s imperial presidency as a precedent and so set the stage for Trump’s MAGA fascism by, after twice having regained the presidency, having refused to enact democratic reforms.

The answer to fascism isn’t to make it kinder and gentler, more hidden so that creeping authoritarianism can operate unseen. Then the rot will have set in, the cancer would be terminal.

That would be the worst outcome possible. If we don’t deal with the problem now, the next wannabe dictator is likely to be far worse than Trump and far more successful. We the American citizenry have a narrow window in which to do the right thing, finally.

* * * *

Further sources about Chomsky and Epstein:

“He was not fooled by Epstein. He was seduced. His association with Epstein is a terrible and, to many, unforgivable stain. It irreparably tarnishes his legacy.”
~Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky, Jeffrey Epstein and the Politics of Betrayal

“Since Noam cannot speak or write and explain his relationship with Epstein, the matter is fraught. There is nothing to say on his behalf. When the photos and emails appeared, I was immediately disgusted by Epstein’s paedophilia, and so by Noam’s friendship with him. There is no defence for this, in my view, no context that can explain this outrage.”
~Vijay Prashad, On the Emails Between Jeffrey Epstein and Noam Chomsky

Beyond the Clickbait: Epstein, Chomsky, Trump & Hero Worship in the Age of Digital Disinfo
by Fiorella Isabel & Vanessa Belley

A Note on Chomsky and Epstein
by Jeffrey St. Clair

Jeffrey Epstein thought he was mostly innocent. So did Noam Chomsky.
by P. Z. Myers

Noam Chomsky involved in dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.
by Tendance Coatsey

Noam Chomsky’s Epstein Problem
by Deniz Karabacak

When a Critic of Empire Sits at the Table of an Abuser of Power
by Emily

Unravelling the connection of Noam Chomsky with convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein
by Robin Westenra

Noam Chomsky Was Devoted To Epstein To The End
from Violet News

“By staying at MIT, Chomsky chose to maintain his career, in relative proximity to the centers of power he would later become an icon for denouncing. However, it shows that Chomsky, from this time onward, began to make some choices that undermined his radicalism to an extent. Chomsky may have rationalized his decision to stay at MIT in the 1960s because it gave him a better platform from which to espouse his political and anti-war views. It is not unheard of for prominent public figures to make such compromises. However, in light of the recent Epstein revelations and what they appear to signal, it seems that Chomsky, particularly in his later years, may have become too comfortable and too willing to make these types of compromises – ones that a much younger Chomsky would have surely rejected.
~Whitney Webb, Unraveling the Epstein-Chomsky Relationship

“A crucial principle I learned from Chomsky: to understand power, you have to follow the money. And that’s still true. Except — what Chomsky fails to consider — is that he himself is part of the system of power that he claims to unravel. In assuming academic objectivity, he took himself out of the system without any justification.

“Because, if you do follow the money, some pathways run through him, whether in his prestigious and privileged position at MIT, or, a $1,400-a-night suite in Manhattan, paid for by Epstein. That’s where he stays. And that’s where we are. […]

“What did Chomsky give in exchange for Epstein’s favors? Was it his position disfavoring BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) against Israel while it commits apartheid and genocide in Palestine? Or is it his loyal support for a “two-state solution” 20 years after Israel has paved over that idea’s grave with the Apartheid Wall? Don’t we have a right to ask?”
~Ramsey Hanhan, Epstein Academy