Here is a fairly nice documentary.
Many great points are brought up about the ideal of a meritocratic society. One point made that I highly agree with is that if the rich deserve to be rich, then the poor deserve to be poor.
Where I think this documentary missed out is on the details. The narrator states that American meritocracy doesn’t assert that all are equal but that all are given equal opportunity. The problem I had is he didn’t analyze this in any great detail (environment, pollution, health, nutrition, medicine, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc.). The inequality between people is so vast in the world that any theoretical equal opportunity is just a joke. It’s quite easy to criticize the very notion of equal opportunity on any number of grounds.
A very small minority hold most of the world’s wealth and power, and the vast majority of this wealth and power is passed down from generation to generation within a very small set of families and bloodlines. A teacher that was interviewed stated that meritocracy was an eternal goal which implies it’s a goal that never is actualized in the real world. So, it’s a pleasant fantasy to keep the masses contented.
Furthermore, the wealth and power of the developed industrialized nations is built on the very poverty and disempowerment of the rest of the world. Does the slave-wage worker in a sweatshop deserve his lot? Do Americans deserve the cheap products the get through the suffering of the poor? Do Middle Easterners deserve all the conflict that the West bestows upon them simply because we think we deserve their oil? Does South and Central America deserve all of the political unrest caused by the CIA and the American War on Drugs?
For further information on how to be included among the elite who deserve all of their power and wealth, see the following:
Also, check out Barbara Ehrenreich’s view presented in her book Bright-sided.
The inspiration for her writing about positive thinking was her experience with cancer. She saw the darkside of positive thinking within the cancer community.
This brings to mind my own grandmother who died of cancer. It’s because of her that I was raised in New Thought Christianity where positive thinking is very popular. She was diagnosed with cancer. She embraced the whole alternative medicine field and she had great faith in positive thinking. My dad says she was utterly crushed when doing all the right things didn’t make her cancer go away. She died of cancer. She was a woman who had a great sense of faith, and apparently I inherited my spiritual interests from her. I’ve seen all aspects of positive thinking and so I have a personal sense of what Ehrenreich is talking about.
But what is different is that positive thinking has become mainstream like never before. It’s not just alternative types. Positive thinking has become merged with the early American ideals of meritocracy, and together they create something greater than either alone.
In one video I saw of Ehrenreich, she made an interesting connection. She was talking about the meritocracy ideal, but I don’t think she was using that term. She was just talking about the ideal of positivie thinking in general within American culture. She connected this with Ayn Rand’s libertarians. If I remember correctly, she was making the argument that Rand was a one of the factors in popularizing positive thinking. She mentioned the book The Secret and how it’s representative of our whole culture. She blames the economic troubles we’re having now with the business culture of positive thinking, and it makes a lot of sense to me.