An good point is made in the last part of this video. When Bush was president he stated that he believed he was on a mission for God. The fundamentalists who helped vote him into office believed this was true. It’s probably this same group that now believes (in fairly large numbers, in fact) that Obama is the Anti-Christ. According to fundamentalist theology, the Anti-Christ will convince the unsaved (i.e., those who aren’t a part of the ‘elect’) that he is the Messiah.
So, these fundamentalists assume that liberals think about their leaders in the same way. But Cenk points out that he has never heard a liberal claim that Obama is the Messiah sent from God. The very idea seems absurd to most liberals, but the idea of a political leader being on a mission from God doesn’t seem absurd to many conservatives.
I came across an intelligent blog about the Jewish tablet that describes another supposed messiah prior to Christianity. What is interesting is that this messiah was resurrected after 3 days. But this isn’t anything new. This 3 day motif related to a savior is found withn pre-Christian Paganism. It’s an astrotheological motif about the solar cycle. Similar 3 day motifs can be found within Jewish scripture as well, but what is significant is that it is directly related to the messiah in this tablet. If orthodox Christianity was actually based on the evidence of historical documents, there would be a mass loss of faith at hearing such news.
Below is an excerpt from the blog and below that are some excerpts from the comments.
Frankly, if you’ve been paying attention or looked into history at all, this shouldn’t be that surprising. That a story about rebirth and resurrection should crop up while the Roman Republic was reinventing itself, and while its newly appointed Princeps Augustus was touting his reign as rebirth on a national scale, is no coincidence. During the first half of what we now call the first century C.E., rebirth was a common religious theme: mystery cults built around rebirth, like the cult of Isis and Osiris, were cropping up everywhere. New religions always mirror and appropriate temporal events to the divine (look at Mormonism). Christianity is no different, and it’s not immune from history. That the non-uniqueness of the Christian story should be so strikingly and starkly presented by this tablet may be shocking, but that human events beget religious beliefs is an anthropological Law.
What I wonder is whether that should be troubling. No doubt many believing Christians will feel threatened by the discovery that their religion has roots older than the name “Jesus,” and no doubt it proves that religion is always affected (and at least partially inspired) by humans. It may even suggest that it therefore might be fabricated. But if you really believe in the truth of the underlying story – i.e., if you’re truly spiritual and not just religious – that shouldn’t matter.