Here is my response to Quentin S. Crisp’s post Metta:
I’ve read about Buddhism and I’ve practiced various forms of meditation, but for whatever reason that line of spirituality never fully engaged me. However, Eastern ideas have heavily informed my worldview.
I was raised in extremely liberal Christianity and so I have no distasteful memories of my Christian upbringing. I’ve never denied Christianity, but I can’t say that I exactly identify as Christian. I am, however, culturally Christian. I’ve studied Christianity to a great degree and it fascinates me on many levels. On a spiritual level, I am drawn too much within Christianity.
It’s hard for me to identify with modern mainstream Christianity as I was raised in counterculture Christianity and so I have an affinity to the early Christians kicked out of mainstream Christianity by the heresiologists. There is an element within Gnosticism that was picked up by the alchemists and the kabbalists which saw spirituality as being a part of this world.
My own understandings of this are filtered through the scholarship of many authors, but specifically Carl Jung and Philip K. Dick have influenced me the most. Those two weren’t Christians in the normal sense as their sense of Christianity was influenced by Eastern thought. Those two also had a very psychological view of religion.
That mixing of Gnosticism, Eastern thought, and psychology captures my own sensibility… and somewhat resembles the Christianity I was raised in. I understand the impulse towards the other-worldly, but it isn’t in me to think in those terms. If there are spiritual truths, then they must be relevantly real to me in this time and place.
I don’t worry about being saved or trying to control my ultimate fate. I just want to understand, to glimpse the world for what it is. I don’t think there is any final truth, but there are many truths all around us and within us. I mistrust anyone who believes they have it figured out.
This leads me on to a few things. Well, at least a couple of things. The first of these is that, even after my rejection of Buddhism, I have found myself again recently struggling with what might be described as variant forms of Buddhism that stress something like the indifference of the cosmos to humankind, the worthlessness of humankind, and so on. It seems that there are some who claim the only significant change is a kind of catastrophic enlightenment, which effectively seems to place you outside the rest of the human race in some way. Well, to this I say balls. I assert that even a small change is worth making and that even a small difference is still a difference. Yes, even a difference within the much-derided human identity rather than one that obliterates it.
I’m a bit split here. I have had spiritual experiences that blew away any normal sense of self. It at times did feel like a void that potentially could’ve swallowed me, but I survived to tell the tale. It wasn’t a bad experience though. It did feel like I was touching upon some profound truth. The reason why I feel split is because the experience itself (or rather my reaction to it) made me feel split. I felt simultaneously intimately close to the world (including everyone in it) and infinitely alone (as in singular or somehow without clear distinction). But it certainly wasn’t inhuman per se. If anything, it was more than human. The cosmos can’t be indifferent to mankind if there is no real separation between the two. Some might want to make this into a vision of light and love, but it wasn’t that either. It was just a sense of seeing/feeling clearly… both the good and the bad, the joy and the suffering.
Catastrophic enlightenment has always intrigued me. It’s a tempting idea. The experience I had was fairly catastrophic, but there is no way I could claim any enlightenment from such catastrophe. My experience wasn’t, however, so catastrophic as to permanently obliterate my sense of individuality or my sense of the individuality of others. It actually gave me a deeper appreciation of the interiority of this thing we call humanity. I think Jung and PKD also sensed something similar (PKD especially was obsessed with the human and inhuman). The element of relationship was very important in both of their writings, and I think relationship (whether of human ‘love’ or contemplating a rock) when experienced deeply does point to something beyond (the betwixt and between of the Trickster’s territory).
I don’t know if small changes matter in any grand way, but it is true that a small difference is still a difference. The world consists of nothing other than the small, so small in fact that we don’t even notice it. Whatever such change may or may not mean, I tend to take a more Daoist approach. Change is change is change. I’m waiting for neither apocalypse on earth nor salvation in heaven. I do sense something in the promise that early Christians/Gnostics spoke of, but I just sense that promise as being an eternally present potential (new eyes to see, new ears to hear).
Actually, I’ve always liked the Lord’s Prayer, but then I have the benefit of not having been brought up within any denomination, and therefore do not see the words as doctrinal:
Forgive us our trespasses
As we forgive those who trespass against us
Isn’t this just a way – a simple and profound way – of saying, “We’re all imperfect, so let’s call it quits and move on”?
Yeah, I’d probably interpret it that way as well because I grew up with a non-traditional translation from the Aramaic (btw here is an interesting direct translation from the Aramaic). I also don’t see much of Christianity in doctrinal terms because I’ve researched how much of it originated in pagan philosophy and religion.
Parallels in the Lord’s Prayer can be found in Spell 125 of the Egyptian Book of the Dead.
This subject has been covered in quite a few texts – please look at what I wish to put forth as an edit and comment on what else it needs.
There are similarities between the Lord’s Prayer and The Judgement of the Dead (Ch.125) in the Egyptian Book of the Dead. Similarities in the full text are highlighted and phrases are repeated. The full text is available from here
Janzen, W. “Old Testament Ethics” 1994 Westminster/John Knox Press
- Address to the gods of the underworld
- Hail, gods, who dwell in the house of the Two Truths.
- I know you and I know your names.
- Let me not fall under your slaughter-knives,
- And do not bring my wickedness to Osiris, the god you serve.
- Let no evil come to me from you.
- Declare me right and true in the presence of Osiris,
- Because I have done what is right and true in Egypt.
- I have not cursed a god.
- I have not suffered evil through the king who ruled my day.
- Hail , gods who dwell in the Hall of the Two Truths,
- Who have no evil in your bodies, who live upon maat ,
- Who feed upon maat in the presence of Horus
- Who lives within his divine disk. 14
- Deliver me from the god Baba,
- Who lives on the entrails of the mighty ones on the day of the great judgement.
- Grant that I may come to you,
- For I have committed no faults,
- I have not sinned,
- I have not done evil,
- I have not lied,
- Therefore let nothing evil happen to me.
- I live on maat , and I feed on maat,
- I have performed the commandments of me and the things pleasing to the gods,
- I have made the god to be at peace with me,
- I have acted according to his will.
- I have given bread to the hungry man, and water to the thirsty man,
- And clothes to the naked man, and a boat to the boatless.
- I have made holy offerings to the gods,
- and meals for the dead.
- Deliver me, protect me, accuse me not in the presence of Osiris.
- I am pure of mouth and pure of hands,
- Therefore, let all who see me welcome me,
- For I have heard the mighty word which the spiritual bodies spoke to the Cat,
- In the House of Hapt-Re, the Open-Mouthed;
- I gave testimony before the god Hra-f-ha-f, the Backwards-Face,
- I have the branching out of the ished-tree in Re-stau. 15
- I have offered prayers to the gods and I know their persons.
- I have come and I have advanced to declare maat,
- And to set the balance upon what supports it in the Underworld.
- Hail, you who are exalted upon your standard, Lord of the Atefu crown,
- Who name is “God of Breath”, deliver me from your divine messengers,
- Who cause fearful deeds, and calamities,
- Who are without coverings for their faces,
- For I have done maat for the Lord of maat.
- I have purified myself and my breast, my lower parts, with the things which make clean.
- My inner parts have been in the Pool of maat.
- I have been purified in the Pool of the south,
- And I have rested in the northern city which is in the Field of the Grasshoppers,
- Where the sacred sailors of Ra bathe at the second hour of the night and third hour of the day.
- And the hearts of the gods are pleased after they have passed through it,
- Whether by day or by night.
The god of this Earth is the ruler of the horizon.
The god is for making great his name. Devote yourself to the adoration of his name.
Give your god existence.
He will do your business.
His likenesses are upon the Earth.
(God) is given incense and food offerings daily.
The god will judge the true and honest.
Guard against the things that god abominates.
Preserve me from decay.
(God) is the king of the horizon.
He magnifies whoever magnifies him.
Let tomorrow be as today.
Walker says, “Of all savior-gods worshipped at the beginning of the Christian era, Osiris may have contributed more details to the evolving Christ figure than any other. Already very old in Egypt, Osiris was identified with nearly every other Egyptian god and was on the way to absorbing them all. He had well over 200 divine names. He was called the Lord of Lords, King of Kings, God of Gods. He was the Resurrection and the Life, the Good Shepherd, Eternity and Everlastingness, the god who ‘made men and women to be born again.’ Budge says, ‘From first to last, Osiris was to the Egyptians the god-man who suffered, and died, and rose again, and reigned eternally in heaven. They believed that they would inherit eternal life, just as he had done. . . . Osiris’s coming was announced by Three Wise Men: the three stars Mintaka, Anilam, and Alnitak in the belt of Orion, which point directly to Osiris’s star in the east, Sirius (Sothis), significator of his birth. . . . Certainly Osiris was a prototypical Messiah, as well as a devoured Host. His flesh was eaten in the form of communion cakes of wheat, the ‘plant of Truth.’ . . . The cult of Osiris contributed a number of ideas and phrases to the Bible. The 23rd Psalm copied an Egyptian text appealing to Osiris the Good Shepherd to lead the deceased to the ‘green pastures’ and ‘still waters’ of the nefer-nefer land, to restore the soul to the body, and to give protection in the valley of the shadow of death (the Tuat). The Lord’s Prayer was prefigured by an Egyptian hymn to Osiris-Amen beginning. ‘O Amen, O Amen, who are in heaven.’ Amen was also invoked at the end of every prayer.“
The Christ Conspiracy by Acharya S
Christ in Egypt by Acharya S, D.M. Murdock
Ancient Egypt, the light of the world by Gerald Massey
Filed under: Christianity, Gnosticism, Philosophy, religion, Spirituality | Tagged: Acharya S, Amen, Buddhism, Christianity, D.M. Murdock, Egypt, Egyptian, Gnosticism, Lord's Prayer, metta, Osiris, Quentin S. Crisp, religion, Spirituality, translation | 2 Comments »